W.K. v. Farrell
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Fain, Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, W.K., appeals from an order of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas compelling arbitration of her complaint. W.K. contends that her claims should not be subject to the arbitration agreement that she had signed prior to becoming employed with defendant-appellee Sterling Jewelers, Inc., because there was no meeting of the minds as to the agreement. She further contends that the arbitration agreement is adhesive and unconscionable. In addition, W.K. contends that the trial court erred in allowing discovery only as to the arbitration issue and that…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Pons v. Ohio State Medical BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Jones v. U-Haul Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
- Jessica Hines v. Nat'l Entm't Grp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
- Jock v. Sterling Jewelers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Rudolph v. Wright Patt Credit UnionOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- outback/buckeye-ii v. Lofino Trust, Unpublished Decision (2-9-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.