outback/buckeye-ii v. Lofino Trust, Unpublished Decision (2-9-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant Charles J. Lofino Grandchildren's Trust (Lofino) appeals from an order granting a permanent injunction in favor of Plaintiffs-Appellees Outback/Buckeye II, Limited Partnership and Cheeseburger-Buckeye, Limited Partnership (Outback and Cheeseburger). Lofino contends that the trial court erred by failing to enforce the clear and unambiguous termination provisions of the parties' contracts and by misinterpreting the meaning of a contract term, "Landlord's Work." Lofino further contends that the trial court erred by failing to comply with Civ. R. 65(D) and with…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Galmish v. CicchiniOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Andrews v. California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Galmish v. CicchiniOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- W.K. v. FarrellOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Mead Corp., Diconix, Inc., Successor v. LaneOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Connor Group v. RaneyOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Carpenter v. LongOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Thies v. WheelockOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Connor Murphy v. Applewood Vill. Homeowners, Ca2007-09-213 (3-30-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Carpenter v. LongOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.