Legal Opinion

Soraci v. Colonial Sand & Stone Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1948PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPecora, J.

Motion is made to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the court has no jurisdiction of the subject of the action and the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The complaint seeks to recover damages due to the negligence of plaintiff’s employer, whereby the plaintiff became partially disabled by reason of respiratory diseases and early silicosis due to the inhalation of various types of dust. The first cause of action is predicated upon negligence, and the second cause upon alleged violations of various sections of the Labor Law and rules promulgated…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barrencotto v. Cocker Saw Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. delBusto v. E. I. Dupont deNemours & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Scherini v. Titanium Alloy Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1941
  4. delBusto v. E. I. DuPont deNemours & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  5. Schwartz v. Queensboro Farm Products, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cifolo v. General Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  2. Cifolo v. General Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API