Legal Opinion
Barrencotto v. Cocker Saw Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 31, 1934PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.
The complaint in this action alleges that the plaintiff is an employee of the defendant; that in the course of his employment in the defendant’s factory he inhaled dust and other impurities which caused him to contract a disease; that the plaintiff’s exposure to the conditions which resulted in the disease was due to the defendant’s failure to exercise reasonable care and to perform its statutory duties in the operation of its factory, It further alleges that the disease from which the plaintiff is suffering is not an occupational disease for which compensation is payable under the Workmen’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Shanahan v. . Monarch Engineering Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Matter of Lerner v. Rump Bros.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Repka v. Fedders Manufacturing CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Wager v. White Star Candy Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
3Cited by39 opinions
- Williams v. HartshornNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Matter of Goldberg v. 954 Marcy Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Masich v. United States Smelting, Refining & Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1948
- Johannesen v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation & DevelopmentNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Matter of Harman v. Republic Aviation Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.