Legal Opinion
delBusto v. E. I. Dupont deNemours & Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 6, 1938PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.
After issue has been joined herein the defendant moves for judgment on the pleadings. (Rules Civ. Prac. rule 112.)
The complaint herein alleges three causes of action, one being based on alleged violations of the statutory provisions of the State Labor Law; the second being based on alleged violations of the rules of the State Industrial Board adopted pursuant to the Labor Law, and of the Penal Law, section 1275; and the third cause of action alleging negligence on the part of the defendant in violating the provisions of the State Labor Law and the State Industrial Board rules. Each cause of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Shanahan v. . Monarch Engineering Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Morris v. MuldoonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Farnum v. . Garner Print Works and BleacheryNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Repka v. Fedders Manufacturing CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Masich v. United States Smelting, Refining & Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1948
- Gauthier v. Campbell, Wyant & Cannon Foundry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Moffett v. Harbison-Walker Refractories Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Cifolo v. General Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Southwest Stone Company v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.