Legal Opinion

Lee v. Estabrook

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1947No. 30140PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

Plaintiff instituted this action to compel specific performance of a contract to convey real estate, signed by the alleged agent of defendant. The court sustained a demurrer to the complaint, based on the ground that the facts stated therein did not constitute a cause of action. Plaintiff refused to plead further, the cause was dismissed, and this appeal resulted.

Plaintiff’s assignments of error are: in holding that the amended complaint failed to state a cause of action, and in sustaining the demurrer to the complaint.

It is necessary to refer to the complaint and set out portions of exhibits…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Carstens v. McReavyWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Samson v. BealeWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Armstrong v. OakleyWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Ankeny v. Young Bros.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Kosten v. FlemingWashington Supreme Court · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  2. State v. NewtonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Lindsey v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. State v. BeardWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Lankford v. TombariWashington Supreme Court · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API