Legal Opinion

Ankeny v. Young Bros.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1909No. 7791PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Albertson, J., entered July 16, 1908, granting a new trial for error of law, after a nonsuit, upon a trial before the court and a jury, in an action for goods sold and delivered.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

The complaint alleges, that about the 27th day of September, 1905, the defendant purchased from Castle Bros., in the city of San Francisco, and said Castle *239Bros, then and there sold and delivered to the defendant, sixty-five bags of Guatemalan coffee, at the agreed price of $1,072.46; that Castle Bros, expended for carting the coffee the sum of $3, which the defendant agreed to pay, and that no part of the same has been paid. For a second cause of action it is alleged, that on or about the same date the defendant purchased from Bloom Bros., in the city of San Francisco, and the said Bloom…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Foster v. RockwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Stanolind Crude Oil Purchasing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  2. Wolfe v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  3. Crane Co. v. James McHugh Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  4. Lee v. EstabrookWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Sharpe Sign Co. v. ParrishWashington Supreme Court · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API