Legal Opinion

State v. Newton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1987No. 52520-0PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Utter, J. —

Donald Newton appeals his convictions in a jury trial for forgery and second degree possession of stolen property. Over defendant's objection, the trial court explored the underlying facts of a prior conviction to determine whether it was admissible as a crime involving "dishonesty or false statement" under ER 609(a)(2). The trial court then permitted the admission, for impeachment purposes, of Newton's prior conviction for third degree theft. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

Reference to prior crimes for impeachment purposes in a criminal trial has extraordinary potential for…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Morris W. Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  3. State v. CoeWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Tommy P. v. Board of County CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. AlexisWashington Supreme Court · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. DennisonWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. RayWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. RiversWashington Supreme Court · 1996

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API