Legal Opinion

Ranch Homes, Inc. v. Greater Park City Corp.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1979No. 15467PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice:

Defendant appeals from a judgment requiring it to respond in damages for breach of an option agreement.

The basic facts pertaining to the option are not in dispute. By the terms of the agreement, plaintiff paid defendant $10,000 for a seven-month option to purchase for the sum of $502,000 some 30 acres of land in Park City, Summit County, Utah. In the event the option was exercised, defendant was then to install, or cause to be installed, a paved roadway and various utility lines to the boundary of the optioned property. Plaintiff exercised the option in a timely manner, but…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Charlton v. HackettUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Arctic Contractors, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Prince v. PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Valley National Bank v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Cohn v. JC Penney Company, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Price-Orem Investment Co. v. Rollins, Brown & Gunnell, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Mahmood v. RossUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. MarchantUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Highland Construction Co. v. Union Pacific RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Brown's Shoe Fit Co. v. OlchCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API