Legal Opinion

Mahmood v. Ross

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1999No. 970214PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Chief Justice:

INTRODUCTION

¶ 1 Defendant Dorothy Ross, in her eapaeity as personal representative of the Estate of Galen Ross, deceased, appeals from the district court’s judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Badi Mahmood. The judgment was entered pursuant to a jury verdict which found that Galen Ross had breached a settlement agreement with Mahmood, and which awarded Mahmood over $796,360.79 in direct and consequential damages.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 In 1980, Galen Ross and William Bass introduced Badi Mahmood to a business opportunity involving the purchase of real estate in New Mexico.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Beck v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Harline v. BarkerUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Exton Drive-In, Inc. v. Home Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Billings v. Union Bankers Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Cook Associates, Inc. v. WarnickUtah Supreme Court · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. GeoMetWatch v. BehuninCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
  3. State v. MontoyaUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Cabaness v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Smith v. Fairfax Realty, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2003

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API