James Heekin Co. v. Baker
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota.
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DEVANTER, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a decree dismissing a bill for the infringement of letters patent No. 650,129, for certain new and useful improvements in drip-coffeepots, granted May 22, 1900, to Charles Eewis, assignor of the appellant. *64The coffeemaker of the appellees, the manufacture and sale of which is claimed to infringe the letters patent of the appellant, is covered by letters patent Nos. 710,132 and 710,133, granted September 30, 1902, to Thomas K. Baker, assignor of the appellees. The defenses were want of patentable novelty, and noninfringement in the manufacture…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- National Hollow Brake-Beam Co. v. Interchangeable Brake-Beam Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Heaton-Peninsular Button-Fastener Co. v. Eureka Specialty Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Ohio Brass Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
- Standard Caster & Wheel Co. v. Caster Socket Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
- Dowagiac Mfg. Co. v. Minnesota Moline Plow Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Dawson Chemical Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- New York Scaffolding Co. v. WhitneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
- United Shoe Machinery Corp. v. KamborianCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1947
- Hyman v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.