Legal Opinion
United Shoe Machinery Corp. v. Kamborian
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 13, 1947No. 4153PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff, Kamborian, is the owner of patents used in the manufacture of shoes, and the other plaintiff, International Shoe Machine Corporation, is the sole licensee of Kamborian under the patents. The two patents sued upon are Numbers 2,251,284 and 2,254,224. The second patent is a process patent and was separated from the apparatus patent in the course of the journey of the latter through the patent office. Two claims only of each patent are involved.1 The district court found that the patents were valid.and infringed. The defendant on this appeal challenges the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Coupe v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Computing Scale Co. v. Standard Computing Scale Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
- Doble Engineering Co. v. Leeds & Northrup Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1943
- James Heekin Co. v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Manhattan Book Casing Mach. Co. v. E. C. Fuller Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- The B. F. Goodrich Company v. Rubber Latex Products, Inc. And Harrison & Morton Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Cafritz v. KoslowCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
- Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1955
- Kamborian v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1947
- Rca Corp. v. Applied Digital Data Systems, Inc., Hazeltine Corp., and Lear Siegler, Inc., Lear Siegler, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Rca Corp., Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.