Legal Opinion

Hyman v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 8, 1928No. Nos. 7967, 7968PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, District Judge.

In cause No. 7967, Hyman brought a suit against the Woolworth Company for injunction and accounting, predicated on an alleged infringement of patent No. 1,445,193, issued February 13, 1923, to Ernest Alsehuler. After its issue such patent passed by assignment to appellant. The trial court held that there was no infringement and entered a decree dismissing the bill.

The claims of the patent in suit alleged to have been infringed are Nos. 6, 7, 8 and 9. They read as follows:

“6. A battery hand lamp, comprising, a battery receiving easing provided with an exterior end…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  4. Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Burr v. DuryeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1864

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. ClairCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  2. Johns-Manville Corporation v. National Tank Seal Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  3. McKays Co. v. Penn Electric Switch Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  4. Mantz v. KerstingDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1939
  5. Edwards v. Johnston Formation Testing Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API