Legal Opinion

Dowagiac Mfg. Co. v. Minnesota Moline Plow Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 1, 1902No. Nos. 1,719, 1,720PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota.

1Opinion of the Court

CARLAND, District Judge.

This action was brought in the court below by the Dowagiac Manufacturing Company against the Minnesota Moline Plow Company and others, for the alleged infringement of claims i, 2, and 3 of letters patent No. 446,230, issued February 10, 1891, to Will F. Hoyt. Two structures are involved in the suit, and are referred to in the record as the “McSherry Old Strufcture” and “Defendant’s Second Structure.” The circuit court held the McSherry old structure to be an infringement, and the second structure not to be an infringement. The Dowagiac Manufacturing Company has…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Cochrane v. DeenerSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. National Hollow Brake-Beam Co. v. Interchangeable Brake-Beam Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  5. Consolidated Safety-Valve Co. v. Crosby Steam Gauge & Valve Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. ClairCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  2. Freeman v. AltvaterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  3. McDONOUGH v. JOHNSON-WENTWORTH CO.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  4. Diamond Power Specialty Corporation v. Bayer Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  5. Dowagiac Mfg. Co. v. Brennan & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API