Legal Opinion
United States v. Lambus
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 4, 2017No. 15-CR-382PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS
Jack B. Weinstein, Senior United States District Judge
Table of Contents
I. Introduction... 474
II. Facts... 474
A. State Parole Supervision of Lam-bus. . .475
B. Installation of the Ankle Bracelet Tracking Device... 476
C. Federal Takeover.. .477
1. BSS Collaboration with Federal Law Enforcement.. .477
2. Circumvention of the DOCCS Supervisory Bureau...483
3. Use of Tracking Devices Solely to Further the Federal Criminal Investigation. . .485
4. Knowledge by Federal Authorities of Need for Judicial Approval... 487
III. Law...488
A. Motion to Suppress... 488
B.…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. LambusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- United States v. BrennanDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019