Legal Opinion

United States v. Lambus

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 25, 2018No. Docket 16-4296; August Term, 2017PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEARSE, Circuit Judge:

Appeal by the United States from so much of two pretrial orders of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Jack B. Weinstein, Judge , as (1) granted motions by defendants Kamel Lambus and Stanley Fuller to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to one of several court-authorized wiretaps, and (2) granted a motion by Lambus to suppress location data generated by a GPS

*372 tracking device attached to his ankle by his New York State parole officers. The district court ruled that the wiretap applicant had knowingly withheld from and misrepresented to…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Lanning v. City of Glens FallsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  3. Com. v. Rosendary, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. United States v. Lauria (Molina)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
  5. United States v. Mark RussellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API