Legal Opinion

Gowing v. McCandless

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 6, 1976No. 47,866PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Schroeder, J.:

This is an action by upper landowners to recover $219,457.50 for alleged crop damages and $100,000.00 for punitive damages for an alleged obstruction of a watercourse by the lower landowners. (A second cause of action sought an order requiring the removal of the alleged obstructions, but was not resolved by the trial court when this appeal was taken.) A jury awarded the upper landowners, Tommy and Patricia Gowing (plaintiffs-appellees), the sum of $4,575.00 for crop damages. The lower landowners, Layton and Lydian McCandless…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kansas Pacific Railway v. MihlmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  2. McDaniel v. City of CherryvaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Jeakins v. City of El DoradoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  4. Union Trust Co. v. CuppySupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  5. Henderson v. TalbottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Nash Oil & Gas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  2. Russo Farms, Inc. v. Vineland Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  3. McAlister v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  4. Dougan v. Rossville Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  5. Williams v. Amoco Production Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API