Medina v. State

Plaintiff, a former employee of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), appeals from a general judgment of dismissal with prejudice, which the trial court entered after granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs claims of race discrimination, retaliation for complaining of race discrimination, and retaliation for engaging in whistleblower activity.1 Plaintiff assigns error to the trial court’s summary judgment rulings, arguing that he presented a prima facie case of each of those claims, and thus defendants were not entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We…