Legal Opinion

Gee v. Pendas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Miguel Alvarez, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 10th day of July,- 1903, denying the said defendant’s motion to vacate a previous order for his examination as a witness before trial, and directing him to produce upon such examination certain books and records.. •

1Opinion of the Court

Patterson, J.:

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate an order for the examination of the defendant Alvarez as a witness before trial. The order required the appearance of the defendant at a- designated time and place, to be examined as a witness, and further required that he produce all the books of the partnership, of which lie was a. member, for the purpose of refreshing, his recollection as to certain matters contained therein. The plaintiff sued to recover commissions upon sales of merchandise, under a contract entered into between him and the firm, of which the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Duffy v. Consolidated Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crompton v. DobbsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  2. Coin Novelty Co. v. LindenbornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  3. Coin Novelty Co. v. LindenbornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  4. Rudini v. North British & Mercantile InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1915
  5. Sherman v. EinhornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API