Legal Opinion

Coin Novelty Co. v. Lindenborn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1907Published

Appeal from an order entered on the 9th day of October, 1907, denying a motion to vacate an order for the examination of the defendant before trial and for the production of certain books and papers for inspection.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

The order appealed from must be so modified as to strike out of the order for defendant’s examination so much as directs him to produce for inspection certain books and papers. (Gee v. Pendas, 87 App. Div. 157; Matter of Sands, 98 id. 148.) As so modified, the order will be affirmed, without costs. Present — Patterson, P. J., Ingraham, Clarke, Scott and Lambert, JJ. Order modified as stated in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice. .

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gee v. PendasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903