Legal Opinion
Coin Novelty Co. v. Lindenborn
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 8, 1907Published
Appeal from Special Term. Action by the Coin Novelty Company against Solomon Lindenborn.. ■From an order denying a motion to vacate an order for the examination of defendant before trial, and for the production of certain books-- and papers for inspection, defendant appeals. Modified and affirmed.
1Per curiam
The order appealed from must be so modified as-to strike out of the order for defendant’s examination so much as directs him to produce for inspection certain books and papers. Gee v. Pendas, 87 App. Div. 157, 84 N. Y. Supp. 32; Matter of Sands, 98 App. Div. 148, 90 N. Y. Supp. 749.
As so modified, the order will be affirmed, without costs.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re SandsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Gee v. PendasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903