Legal Opinion

Hunt v. City of Portland

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided September 24, 2010No. Case 08-CV-802-ACPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

ACOSTA, United States Magistrate Judge:

Findings and Recommendation

Plaintiff Lindsay K. Hunt (“Hunt”), filed this action against her former employer, the City of Portland (the “City”), as well as various police officers, including William Hubner, Joseph Schilling, Eric Hendricks, Bryan Parman, and Judy Brumfield (collectively “Defendants”). After dismissing various claims against various defendants, the claims that remain, as set forth in the Second Amended Complaint filed December 19, 2008, (the “Complaint”), are for retaliation based on protected speech under state law,…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Janell Howard v. City of Coos BayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Sanchez v. CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
  3. Maxwell v. Kelly Services, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2010
  4. Ballinger v. Town of KingstonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
  5. Molan v. Deschutes County Sheriff's OfficeDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API