Geneva JPM 2003-PM1, LLC v. Geneva FSCX I, LLC
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOOTEN, Judge.
This appeal concerns the meaning of the term “debt” as defined in a guaranty and associated loan documents. Appellant-creditor challenges the district court’s interpretation of a guaranty providing that respondents-guarantors are liable for “Ten Percent (10%) of the Debt under the Loan Documents.” Appellant foreclosed by action on certain real property and contends that respondents are liable under the guaranty for ten percent of the foreclosure judgments. Therefore, appellant argues, the district court erred by interpreting the guaranty to mean that respondents are…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blattner v. ForsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Dykes v. Sukup Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Ram Mutual Insurance Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- National City Bank of Minneapolis v. LundgrenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Landmark Community Bank, N.A. v. John D. KlingelhutzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- OCFBrook Holdings, LLC v. TKS Brooklyn Ctr. Holding, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026