Legal Opinion

Axe v. Commercial Credit Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 14, 1964No. Civ. 27548, 27549PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.

Plaintiff instituted the present action against defendant Commercial Credit Corporation for damages occasioned by its failure to honor a garnishment levied upon it.

On March 27, 1958, plaintiff commenced an action against 5 & M Lamp Co. (hereinafter S & M) to recover damages under a written contract. For approximately a period of two years prior to plaintiff’s institution of the principal action S 6 M had been assigning its accounts receivable to defendant under a complex factoring arrangement. On April 8, 1958, defendant was served with a writ of attachment with notice of garnishment. On…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Security Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Milana v. Credit Discount Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Revert v. HesseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Walters v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Dawson v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grouse Creek Ranches v. Budget Financial Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Boyle v. HawkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Nolden v. Balzer/Shopes, Inc. (In re Studio Five Designs (USA), Inc.)District Court, N.D. California · 1988
  4. SunCal La Quinta v. Eston CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API