Legal Opinion

Boyle v. Hawkins

California Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1969No. L. A. No. 29597PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

Plaintiff Abe Boyle brings this action under Code of Civil Procedure section 5441 for- wrongfully withholding property from a levy of garnishment. The crucial question in determining this cause is whether defendant Mari-lee Hawkins possessed or controlled certain funds at the time of the levy. In the superior court, a jury found that defendant possessed such funds at the time of the levy amounting to $6,359.11. The judgment appealed from favored plaintiff in this amount.2 We hold that substantial evidence supports this finding and that the judgment should be affirmed.3 Defendant-appellant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Walters v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Marshall v. MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Robinson v. TevisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. BarraganCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Richmond v. Dart Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Cunningham v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Null v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. People v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API