Legal Opinion

Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co. v. Frye

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1927No. 20170. Department OnePublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon an award made in an arbitration proceeding.

On August 3, 1923, the appellant, Charles H. Frye, being then the owner of certain tideland lots and blocks situated in the city of Seattle, entered into a contract with the respondent, Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Company, by the terms of which the respondent agreed to fill the lots and blocks, together with the adjoining streets, with earth by hydraulic sluicing to stipulated levels. For the service, the appellant agreed to pay the respondent “twenty-three and one-half cent's (23%) per cubic yard for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dickie Manufacturing Co. v. Sound Construction & Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. School District No. 5 v. SageWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Hatch v. ColeWashington Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Davidson v. HensenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Davidson v. HensenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Northern State Construction Co. v. BancheroWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Godfrey v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Westmark Properties, Inc. v. McGuireCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API