Legal Opinion
Johnson v. People
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided April 8, 1891PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from the Criminal Court of Cook County; the Hon. Arba N. Waterman, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtGary, J.
This is a prosecution under the Bastardy Act. The jury found that the appellant was the father of the child of the relatrix. His most serious complaint is, that the court refused to give to the jury this instruction :
“ The court instructs the jury, that in this case both the mother of the child and the defendant are competent witnesses, and if one swears that the defendant is the father of the child and the other that he is not, then if they are of equal credibility, the one offsets the other, and unless further evidence, given by other witnesses for the people, or circumstances proved, give…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miller v. BalthasserIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Boylston v. BainIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
- McFarland v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Shaw v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hanke v. CobiskeyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
- Pennsylvania Co. v. VerstenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
- North Chicago Street Railroad v. CottinghamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892
- La Plant v. People ex rel. WarnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
- Stern v. TuchAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.