Legal Opinion

Boylston v. Bain

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1878PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Warren county; the Hon. Arthur A. Smith, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Craig

This was an action of assumpsit, brought by Samuel Bain, on a promissory note executed by C. W. Boylston and M. W. Hall, on the 8th day of November, 1873, due in six months, amount $550, with ten per cent interest. To the declaration the defendants pleaded payment, set-off, and usury. To the plea of usury a replication was filed alleging, in substance, that on November 8th, 1873, Giddings, the principal debtor-in the original note, paid the defendants $550, the full amount of the note sued on, and the indebtedness then due plaintiff to be paid to plaintiff by said defendants in satisfaction…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Condit v. . BaldwinNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Puterbaugh v. FarrellIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Bridenthal v. DavidsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Brown v. Scottish-American Mortgage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Hughes v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  3. Telford v. GarrelsIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Johnson v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
  5. Vaughan v. Peoples Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API