Hanke v. Cobiskey
Appellate Court of Illinois
Memorandum.—Assumpsit for wages. Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. George W. Blanks, Judge, presiding. Submitted at the October term, 1894.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shepard
This was a suit for a’balance claimed to be due for wages. Hothing was in dispu fce except the amount that had been paid. It was admitted that the original indebtedness was $1,068.20. The parties themselves were the only witnesses and differed in their testimony only as to how much had been paid on the account. The defendant admitted that there was a balance of $80.20 due to the plaintiff, and the plaintiff claimed $145.70, making a difference between the two of $65.50.
The cause was heard by the court without a jury and judgment was rendered for the balance claimed by appellee, the plaintiff.
I…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Johnson v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
- Smith v. GrantAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889
- Johnson v. BreatonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1878
- Witner v. ZemanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lasher v. ColtonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899
- Lawther v. EvertsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
- Ross v. SkinnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903
- Sanitary District v. Phoenix Powder Mfg. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1898
- Standard Varnish Co. v. JayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1909