Pennsylvania Co. v. Versten
Appellate Court of Illinois
Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. John P. Altgeld, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtGary, J.
The verdicts of juries in actions for negligence, especially where railroads are defendants, often present the question whether they ought to be sustained upon the evidence. The theory of the legislation of this State upon the subject of jury trials, is that the jury are to be trusted rather than the court.
The court shall instruct only as to the law of the ease, and in writing. All summing of the evidence, all exposure of the sophistry of counsel, which in the old practice was deemed so important to the administration of justice, is prohibited. It does not become the courts to thwart the will…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. HalseyIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Gaffield v. ScottAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. ShenkIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Central Warehouse Co. v. SargeantAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chittick v. Town of LakeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892
- Wollf v. Van HousenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
- Ware v. Illinois Central RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905
- West Chicago Street Railroad v. GroshonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
- Western Stone Co. v. WhalenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894