Unfried v. Balt. & O. R'd Co.
West Virginia Supreme Court
24 W. Ya. 37; 11 W. Ya. 235; 15 Graft. 572; 20 Rep. 239 ; 18 Kan. 529; 9 So. Oar. 20; 11 S. E. Rep. 39; Kerr, Brand & Mist. 73; 10 Atl. Kep. 237; 11 1ST. E. Rep. 764; Id. 477; 10 S. E. Rep. 39; 30 W. Ya. 798 ; 31 W. Ya. 122; 27 W. Ya. 152; Id. 285; 31 W. Ya. 116 ; Id. 142 ; 15 W. Ya. 628. cited: 27 W. Ya. 145; 28 W. Ya. 610; 52 Ill. 183; 11 Graft. 722 ; 19 Barb. 461.
1Opinion of the Court
English Jüdge :
On tiie 16tli day of July, 1884, John Unfried instituted an action of trespass on the case against the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, in the Circuit Court of Ohio county claiming damages to the amount of twenty five thousand dollars for injuries received while in the employ of said railroad company. On the 12tli day of January, 1885, a demurrer was sustained to the plaintiff’s declaration, and on his motion leave was granted him to amend his declaration, and the case was remanded to rules for that purpose. On the first Monday in March, 1885, an amended declaration was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Vinal v. CoreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
- Hawker v. B. &. O. R. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1879
- Snyder v. P., C. & St. L. Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
- Collins v. Albany & Schenectady RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1852
- Pennybacker v. LaidleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1890
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Earl T. Browder, Inc. v. County Court of Webster CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
- City of Lynchburg v. PetersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. McIntireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Osage Coal & Mining Co. v. SperraSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Watts v. Ohio Valley Electric Ry. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.