Legal Opinion

Watts v. Ohio Valley Electric Ry. Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1916PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Cabell County. Action under the Workmen's Compensation Act by Willard Watts against tbe Ohio Valley Electric Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Williams, President:

Plaintiff, a motorman on one of defendant’s cars in the city of Huntington, was injured on the night of June 11, 1914, by colliding with another car being operated by another motorman on the same line. In an action for damages he recovered a judgment against defendant for $3,000, and it seeks reversal on writ of error.

The overruling of defendant’s demurrer to the declaration is the first assignment of error. Counsel insist that the declaration does not allege a cause of action against defendant; that it fails to aver that it has not provided reasonably safe and suitable…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Mondou v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Ives v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Vinal v. CoreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Unfried v. Balt. & O. R'd Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Earl T. Browder, Inc. v. County Court of Webster CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Lester v. State Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Thorn v. Addison Bros. & Smith, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Miller v. United Fuel Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Pritt v. W.V.N.R.R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1948

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API