Legal Opinion

Murrelle v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1943No. 26766. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smith

This case arose under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Plaintiffs in error seek to reverse an award of compensation made by the circuit court of Cook county to Grace E. Murrelle, whose husband died as a result of being bitten by a dog. There is no question raised concerning the injury, or the causal connection between the injury and the death. We will therefore confine our statement of facts to those which bear on the three controverted questions, (1) was deceased an employee of Organ Brothers Company, (2) did the accident arise out of and in the course of the employment, and (3) was Grace E.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Plano Foundry Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  2. VanWatermeullen v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Vulcan Detinning Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Lowry v. CosterIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Western Coal & Mining Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Crepps v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Lawrence v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Henry v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Fransen Construction Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Brewster Motor Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API