Legal Opinion
City of Duluth v. Evans
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 21, 1924No. 23,868PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
The defendant was convicted in the municipal court of the city of Duluth of the offense of selling intoxicating liquors in violation of city ordinance No. 1472 of the city of Duluth. Defendant made a motion for a new trial which was denied, and he appealed to the district court of 'St. Louis county. That court affirmed the order of the trial court, and from the order of the district court denying defendant’s motion for a new trial he has appealed to this court.
It is claimed that the judgment of the court is not justified by the evidence. It is sufficient to say that a witness testified that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Evans v. City of Redwood FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- State ex rel. Zien v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- City of Virginia v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of RichfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State v. SimonsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Shaw v. City of NorfolkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
- Zalk & Josephs Realty Co. v. Stuyvesant InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- State v. DaileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.