Legal Opinion
Zalk & Josephs Realty Co. v. Stuyvesant Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 23, 1934No. 29,735PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
I. M. OLSEN, Justice.
Plaintiffs appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
The action is one to recover upon a fire insurance policy against loss or damage by fire issued by defendant to these plaintiffs. The policy is in the amount of $1,000 upon a two-story, frame building, used for mercantile and lodging purposes, located within the fire limits of the city of Duluth. The insurance was for the term of one year, commencing May 27, 1931. There was, including defendant’s policy, a total of $5,000 insurance on the building under Minnesota standard policies, and the policies fixed…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- American Surety Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- North American Cold Storage Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- State ex rel. Railroad & Warehouse Commission v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- State ex rel. Chapman v. State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Marshall Produce Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Glens Falls Insurance Co. v. PetersTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Anderson v. Commissioner of HighwaysSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Horton v. GulledgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. Industrial Tool & Die Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.