Legal Opinion
State v. Dailey
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 25, 1969No. 41311, 41743PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
Defendants in these two cases, consolidated upon appeal, were convicted of prostitution in violation of a municipal ordinance. The issue common to both appeals, considered first, is whether the municipal ordinance is ineffective on the ground that it has been preempted by a state statute regulating the same subject. Issues not common to both cases but dispositive of the present appeals are considered in separate paragraphs of this opinion.
We hold that the municipal ordinance under which defendants were convicted is not preempted by the state statute. Prostitution is one of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- City of Duluth v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- In Re Trusts Created by HormelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Hamaker v. City of HighmoreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of Detroit v. Recorder's Court JudgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- City of Birchwood Village v. SimesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. Apple Valley Redi-Mix, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. WestrumCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Hannan v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.