Legal Opinion
Roff And Bobbi Arden, V Forsberg Umlauf, Ps
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 3, 2016No. 46991-0-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Maxa, A.C.J.
¶ 1 Roff and Bobbi Arden appeal the trial court’s summary judgment order dismissing their claims against Forsberg & Umlauf PS and attorneys John Hayes and William “Chris” Gibson (collectively Forsberg) for breach of fiduciary duties and legal malpractice. Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford (Hartford), the Ardens’ homeowners’ insurance company, retained Forsberg to defend a lawsuit filed against the Ardens. Hartford provided the defense under a reservation of its rights to deny coverage for any judgment entered against the Ardens.
¶2 First, the Ardens argue that…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Hizey v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- San Diego Navy Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Eriks v. DenverWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Badgley Mullins Turner, Pllc App./x-resp. v. Leslie Spencer & Tammy S., Blakey, Resp./x-app.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Arden v. Forsberg & Umlauf, PSWashington Supreme Court · 2017
- Arden v. Forsberg & Umlauf, PSWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- Degon v. WilliamsDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2024
- George v. JacksonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.