Legal Opinion
GLENPOINTE ASS'N. v. Tp. of Teaneck
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 28, 1990PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
241 N.J. Super. 37 (1990)
574 A.2d 459
GLENPOINTE ASSOCIATES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 31, 1990.
Decided February 28, 1990.
Before Judges KING, BAIME and KEEFE.
Daniel Amster argued the cause for appellant (Amster & Rosensweig, attorneys; Daniel Amster, and Barry J. Cohen on the brief).
Edward G. Rosenblum argued the cause for respondent (Rosenblum & Rosenblum, attorneys; Edward G. Rosenblum, of counsel and on the brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P.J.A.D.
This is a taxpayer's…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- F.M.C. Stores Co. v. Borough of Morris PlainsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Glen Wall Associates v. Township of WallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Murnick v. City of Asbury ParkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Rek Investment Co. v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Venino v. Borough of CarlstadtNew Jersey Tax Court · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- State v. MartiniSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- State v. WakefieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- Yilmaz, Inc. v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- Nowacki v. Community Med. CenterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- Janice J. Prioleau v. Kentucky Fried Chicken, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.