Legal Opinion
Siegal v. City of Newark
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 29, 1962PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Weintkaub, O. J.
Appellants claim their property was assessed for 1958 and 1960 above the “common level” of assessments of other real property. In answers to interrogatories the city stated that “residential” property was assessed in those years at a “common level” of 40% of true value while “commercial and industrial” properties were assessed at a “common level” of 70%. Appellants’ property is in the latter category. The Division of Tax Appeals ordered a reduction to 70% of true value. We certiñed the further appeals to the Appellate Division.
Appellants…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Greene v. Louisville & Interurban RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Taylor v. Louisville & N. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
- Bettigole v. Assessors of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- White River Lumber Co. v. Arkansas Ex Rel. ApplegateSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Chastain's, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Deitch Co. v. Board of Property AssessmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Murnick v. City of Asbury ParkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- City of East Orange v. TP. OF LIVINGSTONNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Kittery Electric Light Co. v. Assessors of KitterySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
- Uniroyal, Inc. v. Board of Tax Review of the Town of MiddleburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.