Legal Opinion

Arment v. City of Dodge City

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 8, 1916No. 19,845PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Ford district court; Gordon L. Finley, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

The plaintiff sued the city and its commissioners to enjoin the paving of a certain street. The defendants in response to a notice appeared by counsel and successfully resisted the granting of a temporary injunction. No summons was issued. It was averred, among other things, that the defendants had entered into a contract for the paving and had appointed appraisers who were appraising all the lands in the paving district instead of the abutting property which alone would be liable; that the resolution declaring the necessity of the work had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hanson v. HansonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  2. Woodhouse v. Nelson Land & Cattle Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Gardner v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Riverside Park Ass'n v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  2. N. A. Kennedy Butter Tub Co. v. First & Hamilton National Bank of Fort WayneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. HaskellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Randall v. City of Arkansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Field v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API