Legal Opinion

Woodhouse v. Nelson Land & Cattle Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 7, 1914No. 18,692; No. 18,693PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeals from Wallace district court; JACOB C. RUPpenthal, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

In these cases the defendant appeared specially to contest the jurisdiction of the court, alleging that the service was void. After a hearing the court held the service to be valid. The attorney for the defendant refused to plead or to participate in the trial which followed, but remained in court. At the conclusion of the trial judgment was rendered for the plaintiff. By suggestion of its attorney the defendant then procured a stay of execution until June 11, 1912. The proceedings recited occurred on the 28th and 29th of May, 1912. Notice of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Neosho Valley Investment Co. v. CornellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  2. Thompson v. GreerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  3. Franse v. ArmbusterNebraska Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. N. A. Kennedy Butter Tub Co. v. First & Hamilton National Bank of Fort WayneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  2. Helm v. HinesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  3. Arment v. City of Dodge CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Matthews v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  5. Clark v. WestSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API