Legal Opinion

Randall v. City of Arkansas City

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 7, 1923No. 24,681PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

In this action the plaintiffs seek to enjoin the defendants from collecting a special assessment levied by the defendant city on real property owned by the plaintiffs. The defendants demurred to the petition; the demurrer was overruled; judgment was rendered for the plaintiffs; and the defendants appeal.

The petition alleges that the plaintiffs are the owners of certain described real property within the corporate limits of Arkansas City; that this real property with other property was made a sewer district by the city; that a sewer was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rockwell v. City of Junction CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  2. City of Topeka v. GageSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. City of ChanuteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  4. Riverside Park Ass'n v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. Board of Public InstructionSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Schenk v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. Sneed v. Shaffer Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  4. Addis v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  5. Kansas City v. Fairfax Drainage Dist.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API