Legal Opinion

Alexander & Alexander of New York, Inc. v. Fritzen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 8, 1989PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Smith, J.

The central questions raised on this appeal are (1) whether the record supports the granting by the motion court of the defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment and (2) whether the individual defendants, all former employees of plaintiff insurance brokerage firm, diverted "corporate opportunities” in the form of life insurance business from plaintiff to the corporate defendants which the former employees controlled.

Plaintiff Albert G. Ruben & Co. (New York), Inc. (AGR or the Ruben firm) is a licensed insurance brokerage firm (Insurance Law § 2104)…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Guard-Life Corp. v. S. Parker Hardware Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Foley v. D'AgostinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  4. Alexander & Alexander of New York, Inc. v. FritzenNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Duane Jones Co. v. BurkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Berman v. SUGO LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  2. Pure Power Boot Camp, Inc. v. Warrior Fitness Boot Camp, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  3. St. John's University, New York v. BoltonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
  4. American Federal Group, Ltd. And Dennis A. Herman, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Barnett Rothenberg, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. American Baptist Churches of Metropolitan New York v. GallowayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API