Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Bayer

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 27, 1995No. 94-G-1853PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Presiding Judge.

“It is essential to the preservation of the rights of every individual, his life, liberty, property, and character, that there be an impartial interpretation of the laws, and administration of justice. It is the right of every citizen to be tried by judges as free, impartial, and independent as the lot of humanity will admit. Massachusetts Constitution of 1780, pt. 1, art. 29 in Federal and State Constitutions 3: 1888, 1893 (Francis N. Thorpe ed. 1909).” Shapiro, Oxford Dictionary of American Legal Quotations (1993) 197.

This tenet continues to be true today as the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Beer v. GriffithOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. City of Garfield Heights v. BrewerOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. CollieOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Richardson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. City of Middletown v. McIntosh, Ca2006-07-174 (7-2-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. NicholsOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. State v. BowersOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API