Legal Opinion

Richardson v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 14, 2004No. 41, Sept. Term, 2003PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Chief Judge.

In this case, we are asked to decide whether showing the defendant, either singly or as a member of a group of defendants, a videotape of a judge giving the advice that Maryland Rule 4-215(a)1 requires and subsequently taking him or her before a judge for bail review comply with that rule and to determine the effect, if any, that procedure has on a subsequent determination that the defendant has waived counsel by inaction, pursuant to Rule 4-215(c) or (d).2 The Court of *351Special Appeals, rather than answer either of the issues, remanded the case to the Circuit Court, with…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Parren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Walther v. Sovereign BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. Broadwater v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Valonis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. Whitney v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  5. Jones v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API