Legal Opinion
State v. Nichols
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 12, 1997No. H-97-006PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment of the Norwalk Municipal Court which found defendant-appellant, Wendy M. Nichols, guilty of failing to file an application for registration of a dog in violation of R.C. 955.21 and guilty of failing to confine a dangerous dog in violation of R.C. 955.22. On the R.C. 955.21 conviction, Nichols was given a thirty-day suspended sentence, fined $100 and ordered to pay court costs of $50.70. In addition, she was placed on probation for two years with the condition that she abide by the law and have no convictions during the probationary period. On the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- United States v. Andrews Bruce CampbellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- City of Garfield Heights v. BrewerOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. WeissOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. KellyOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. Cox, Ca2008-03-028 (3-2-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. VordenbergeOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
- City of Middletown v. McIntosh, Ca2006-07-174 (7-2-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.