Legal Opinion
James M. King & Associates, Inc. v. G.D. Van Wagenen Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 5, 1989No. Civ. 4-86-461PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This action arises out of alleged wrongful actions taken by defendants to prevent plaintiff from selling Collateral Protection Insurance 1 (hereinafter “CPI”) and Residual Value Insurance 2 (hereinafter “RVI”), underwritten by Central National Insurance Company of Omaha (hereinafter “Central National”) or Dependable Insurance Company (hereinafter “Dependable”), to banks in Minnesota. This matter is presently before the Court upon defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
Plaintiff James M. King & Associates, Inc. (hereinafter “King Agency”) is a small general insurance…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Alexander & Alexander Inc. v. B. Dixon Evander & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Amerinet, Inc. v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Ulrich v. City of CrosbyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- Cambio Health Solutions, LLC v. ReardonTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
- Waste Conversion Systems, Inc. v. Greenstone Industries, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.