Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Elsass

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

Respondent offers numerous objections to the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the board. For the following reasons, we reject his objections and adopt the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation of the board.

Regarding Count One, respondent argues that there was no witness testimony that he prepared the motions in the Bartholomew and Beckwith cases. Both respondent and his legal secretary testified that respondent did not dictate those documents. Furthermore, a letter to Bartholomew, which accompanied the motion for continuance, stated,…