Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Komarek

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1998No. 98-398PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

At the outset we note that respondent was suspended from the practice of law on September 14, 1995, for failure to comply with a subpoena and for failure to cooperate in an investigation. That suspension has not been lifted, although relator reported to the Clerk of the Supreme Court that respondent had complied with the subpoena and had met the conditions for reinstatement specified in the order of suspension.

Respondent was also suspended on June 7, 1996, as a result of the answer he filed in this disciplinary case in August 1995 putting his mental illness in issue. It is respondent’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BuschSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. The Florida Bar v. ClementSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  3. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. SternerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Warren County Bar Ass'n v. BunceOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. FettnerOhio Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. GlatkiOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Flynn v. State Med. Bd. of OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. ElsassOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. KomarekOhio Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API