Legal Opinion
Reiff v. Convergent Technologies
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 28, 1997No. Civil Action 95-3575 (JEI)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRENAS, District Judge:
Plaintiffs instituted this products liability action against a manufacturer of computer keyboards seeking damages for personal injuries and loss of consortium. Defendants now move the Court to preclude plaintiffs’ expert testimony pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence 403, 702, and 703. Because the admissible proffered expert testimony fails to establish a defect in defendants’ keyboard or establish specific causation between defendants’ product and plaintiffs’ injuries, the Court will grant defendants’ motion in part, grant defendants summary judgment, and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Yarchak v. Trek Bicycle Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Milanowicz v. Raymond Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- Clements v. Sanofi-Aventis, U.S., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Brown Ex Rel. Estate of Brown v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Knipe v. Smithkline BeechamDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.